Book Review: Green

Here is another Thomas Nelson book review, everyone! I finished Ted Dekker’s Green just today, and I am anxious to tell you all what I think. Green is the fourth, and final–maybe, installment in Dekker’s Circle series, which are directly related to his Paradise novels (Saint, Sinner and Showdown) and his series called the Lost Books. The links between these novels are numerous, varied and confusing; albeit they are coherent and brilliant. In all of the above-mentioned novels, Dekker has created a fantasy world in which elements of the spiritual realm in our own world become real characters and settings. It is a modern-day fable paralleling those great works of literary history like The Pilgrim’s Progress, The Lord of the Rings, and The Chronicles of Narnia.

Dekker_Green

There are several criterion important to me when judging a work of quality fiction–character development, pacing and the ending. Others may have other priorities for their literary tastes, but these are what I crave when reading and that is how I will review his book.

It is difficult enough for an author to effectively develop a character over the course of one book, let alone four books. The protagonist must change in believeable ways from start to finish in each novel, and like in the Circle Series, that character must change noticeably throughout the course of the series. Ted Dekker’s character Thomas Hunter is truly a deep and believable character who goes from being an impetuous, street-smart youth in the first novel, Black, to a venerated general of futuristic, nomadic armies in Green. Really, it’s how Dekker leads us through Thomas’ mind that makes the whole fantasy worth taking seriously as the reader feels an immediate attachment and empathy with Thomas. Even in Green, the series’ apocalyptic installment, we find Thomas changing. In the beginning of the book we see the struggling washed out and tired leader who suddenly finds reserves of courage and hope deep within him with the help of Elyon. He returns with a determination seasoned with knowledge. I rarely have found characters so well treated throughout the course of a series.

I have one word to describe Dekker’s pacing in this novel–”whoa.” The pace of each conflict in the book will leave the reader breathless. As a matter of fact, I waited several hours before writing this review just so I could catch my breath! Every scene is laced with emotional and physical tension. If you enjoy some time to breathe in your novels, don’t pick this book up. It will have you looking for a respirator. One nice addition to the pacing of series in this book is a morbid romance set between two dark characters. It was particularly chilling to feel the sensual tension between these two in a Christian fiction novel. Well done.

In every book I read, I love a good, solid ending. It could be a tragedy or comedy, but I like to see things resolved to a good degree. Every good story must end sometime. As much as I don’t want to admit it, I was largely disappointed in the way Green ended. One would think that an apocalyptic book would make an easy way for an author to end a story, no matter how hoaky it may be (Like when everything is about to go to you-know-where, and aliens suddenly appear out of nowhere and save some people. Aliens weren’t a part of the story, but suddenly they’re a part of the solution. Come on. Where’s the creativity in that?), but Ted Dekker finds a way to keep the story alive, although it’s crying to be laid to rest. I imagine this was the man’s intent in trying to imitate a circle in that it has no end or beginning. I felt in a circle alright–no way out.

All in all, I would suggest the Circle Series to anyone, even Green. They are an extremely well-written, heart-pounding adventures with too many connections to our own world to count. The thought invoked by these parables alone are worth the read.

The Start of a Relationship with God

We’ve all heard it said that Christianity “…is a relationship, not a religion.” Is that really true? If it is, then why is it that some people seem to have an incredible relationship with God while others don’t? I’ve always felt that this Christian cliche is way too simplistic to be of much use. Christianity is religion; religion fueled by a relationship.

Yesterday, I was able to speak to a friend whom I’ve not seen for years. We grew up together in the same school and church, yet chose very different paths when our paths became our own. When I asked him what role God played in his life now, he gave me an unexpected answer: “Growing up, I felt that the whole church thing was a bunch of do’s and don’t's. Everyone kept saying, ‘It’s a relationship, not a religion,’ but when I would talked to God, I felt like I received no answers. In my mind, in a relationship, communication is both ways.”

Everyone in the church appeared to have this “relationship” except him, and so he concluded that Christianity truly is about do’s and don’t's and that these people–albeit sincere–were deluding themselves into the belief that there was a friendship involved to make following these rules easier. With this understanding, he began to decide which commandments from the Bible he would follow based on their practical and ethical logic. If the rule did not have a rational purpose, he did not follow it, and now his life has taken some cruel turns, and he’s feeling out of control. His list of do’s and don’t's have failed. His logical way of life has left him empty and wanting. It would seem that the advice given him in the church would be what he needs to hear right now. Get a relationship. But it would neither help nor heal.

Understandably, my friend had grown disillusioned with the popular catch phrase touted by well-meaning people in their effort to make a relationship with God both desirable and easy. The problem with that phrase is that the idea of a relationship with God honestly isn’t that desirable for those who have never been a friend of God, and beginning a relationship with God is never easy. When a friend of mine suggests that I become friends with someone whom I do not know, I normally cringe wondering whether this would be a good thing or not. The same is true with God. Just because someone tells me that I can have a relationship with God doesn’t necessarily mean that I want one.

What most people miss, and what my old friend doesn’t realize yet, is that a relationship with God must start with the knowledge of what He did for us, an understanding of the magnitude of the kindness of God showed to us in what He did, a belief that what He did was enough and a gratitude that would force us to our knees in thankfulness. For example, if someone asked me to be friends with someone I don’t know, I would hesitate. However, if that same stranger had paid off my student loans, and I had the opportunity to be his friend, I would love to meet him! God has done something all at once marvelous and beautiful when He gave His Son to die in our place. He took our punishment; He paid our debt to God. If we truly understand that, why wouldn’t we want a relationship with Him? But we must get the horse before the cart.

Religion is that essential protocol needful for one to realize what God has done. One must approach God with a heart of gratitude in order to have a relationship, and religion is that precious thing which teaches us gratitude through its careful observance of ceremony, law and tradition. Without the “rules” of religion, we could never hope to have a meaningful relationship with God, because we would never know what He has done for us. Religion makes the way for relationship, and relationship keeps religion alive and vibrant. Rather than being mutually exclusive, they are mutually dependent. Once we understand this, our religion and relationship with God will be all the more complete.

What do you think? How do you see it?

Body of Christ Unified? Part 2

With all of the challenges of ministers and leaders working together in the community (check my last post to see some of these challenges), the challenges that these leaders face getting their own organizations unified and running smoothly and the uncertain times that we are living in, why should churches get together in community projects? What’s the benefit of organized effort when each church already has their own community service strategies? Here are some of my thoughts on why it’s critical that local churches collaborate in community projects.

  1. Community Impact — The Church united gives a better image to the community at large. To many people in society, churches are equal in status and purpose as other local non-profits. When they see non-profits that are willing to collaborate on projects for the common good, they wonder why the local churches can’t get together for the common good. The disunity of the churches projects the image that each church has agendas other than the common good. Vice versa, when the churches collaborate in community projects without any direct gain for their organizations, the community trusts their motives. Consequently, they are more receptive to the message of the Gospel. Every church benefits from this feeling of trust when society sees the unity of the churches in community projects.
  2. Shared Resources — The Church united has more resources to meet the needs of society. We live in a Wal-Mart generation: One location services all needs. Although I shop at Wal-Mart, I don’t believe that this is the idea that God had in mind for the churches in His body. Each church has a local vision to answer a specific need in society, much like a cell within the body has a specific function. The needs that the churches meet in order to serve their communities should be very different. Not every church is going to run a food pantry, hold support groups for addictive behaviors, offer counseling services, or administrate complex visual and performing art programs for youth. But together, all of the local churches have these services at their disposal for community projects. Through collaboration on community projects, society has access to all that the Church has to offer.
  3. Cross-Pollenation — The Church united gives its members the opportunity to experience other people of different cultures, ideas and talents; whereas the Church divided sequesters its members within the confines of their local congregation. When churches and ministries collaborate on community projects, the members of the local churches represented in the project are exposed to one another’s unique worship, fellowship and leadership styles. Once exposed to one another through community projects, the members and leaders of local churches can pick and choose which new ideas or styles could be implemented in order to improve the life of their church.

These are my top reasons for championing Church unity in community projects. Bear in mind that collaboration is not the same as integration. I am not proposing that churches should merge in order to be unified. This would be neither healthy nor effective. Yet, when the local churches have put aside their differences and fears, we shall see whole communities changed for the better.

What benefits do you see in churches working together in community projects?